Alito, Kagan, Roberts, Breyer at the top

Sotomayor at the bottom

how do u rank gorsuch/ACB/Thomas/kavanaugh?

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4632683&forum_id=2#40981869)

Roberts

Kagan

Alito

Breyer

Gorsuch

Thomas

Kavanaugh

ACB

SoTTTomayor

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4632683&forum_id=2#40981910)

She said that using "traditional numbers" from test scores, "it would have been highly questionable if I would have been accepted."

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/06/11/sotomayor.affirmative.action/index.html

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4632683&forum_id=2#40987208)

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4632683&forum_id=2#40982075)

and 169 is still good. 96%. implies around 120+ IQ

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4632683&forum_id=2#40981935)

and most SCOTUS justices except the jewish ones probably were around that range 120~130. i doubt some uber genius 145+ IQ gentile bros picked law as a career

what do u think was the IQ of brennan or warren or blackmun or white or burger?

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4632683&forum_id=2#40981969)

Date: September 26th, 2020 9:50 AM

Author: I am thinking of aurochs and angels

i don't know what they need. but i'd have never got my summer assoc position without being at hys and then wouldn't have had the money saved away to open my own firm.

(Shitcons SCRAMBLING to nominate/approve a 169 LSAT prole to SCOTUS)

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4632683&forum_id=2#40990204)

91st percentile IQs (120) are going to have a tough time getting a 96th percentile score on a test for a graduate program.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4632683&forum_id=2#40982531)

Tier 2: Gorsuch, Thomas, Kavanaugh

Tier 3: ACB, Sotomayor

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4632683&forum_id=2#40982024)

And Kavanaugh should go down to Tier 3 with ACB.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4632683&forum_id=2#40982494)

according to Noah Feldman (#1 in his class at HUG, Rhodes Scholar, YLS, SCOTUS clerk, Harvard Junior Fellow, HLS prof):

"In a pre-Garland world, Barrett would deserve to be confirmed without serious trouble. She’s deeply conservative, to be sure. But she’s also a truly brilliant lawyer, as I can attest from having clerked at the Supreme Court the same year she worked for Justice Antonin Scalia.

"For what it’s worth, I don’t use the word brilliant lightly. There were just under 40 Supreme Court clerks in October Term 1998, none exactly a slouch. She was one of the two best lawyers of the 40 — and arguably the single best. Any Senate Democrat who tries to go toe to toe with Barrett over her legal abilities is going to lose. Badly. She has only eight months’ experience on the court of appeals after a career as a law professor. But she was legally prepared enough to go on the court 20 years ago."

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2018-07-09/trump-supreme-court-pick-conventional-and-unconventional-wisdom

yeah, sounds like a real dummy! libs should definitely use "not smart enough" as their next line of attack on Barrett if "campus-rape apologist" and "religious fanatic" don't pan out. I'm sure any day now top conservative law profs will start writing letters to Trump warning him that, bluntly put, she’s not nearly as smart as she seems to think she is!

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4632683&forum_id=2#40983608)

ok thats a great recommendation from a shitlib guy so you can assume that there is no exaggeration. move her to tier 1 with roberts, kagan, alito and breyer

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4632683&forum_id=2#40983619)

Do we really think MDH is a ‘brilliant lawyer’? C’mon man!

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4632683&forum_id=2#40984440)

of course they do

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4632683&forum_id=2#41024511)

Also fuck what some infatuated mincing melvinstein thinks

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4632683&forum_id=2#41024150)

u: impotently ragepoasting

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4632683&forum_id=2#40988258)

When assigned to work on an extremely complex, difficult case, especially one involving a hard-to-comprehend statutory scheme, I would first go to Barrett to explain it to me. Then I would go to Martinez to tell me what I should think about it.

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-09-26/amy-coney-barrett-deserves-to-be-on-the-supreme-court

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4632683&forum_id=2#40989934)

Jesus. He put that in print. Devastating to him and to Martinez.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4632683&forum_id=2#40989981)

Martinez had the special skill of connecting the tangle of complex strands to a sensible statutory purpose. She clerked for Justice Stephen Breyer, who also believes in pragmatically engaging the question of what a statute is actually trying to do in order to interpret it.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4632683&forum_id=2#40990001)

Jews/libs?

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4632683&forum_id=2#41024518)

Noah Feldman: "I am stupid and get women to do my homework for me. Yet because of my white penis I had a job I apparently admit I did not deserve."

https://twitter.com/mldauber/status/1309886565137543168

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4632683&forum_id=2#40992477)

Feldman was literally #1 in his class at Harvard.

"'...because of my white penis I had a job...'"

Has this retard heard of affirmative action?

"She is an activist against campus sexual assault. In 2011, she became co-chair of Stanford’s Board on Judicial Affairs. Dauber’s committee worked with the provost’s office in its years-long revision of the rules. The new process included lowering the burden of proof to a “preponderance of evidence” and providing for an investigator who reported back to a trained five-person panel. The accuser and accused never had to be in the room together.[3] In April 2017, Stanford administrators discouraged her from using a picture of President Donald Trump to illustrate the fliers for a presentation on sexual assault.[4]"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michele_Dauber

No wonder this freak show is so angry about Barrett, who ruled against Purdue University in a campus-rape kangaroo court case.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4632683&forum_id=2#40993034)

https://www.lstreports.com/schools/notredame/admissions/

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4632683&forum_id=2#41024422)