For those asking for an explanation of the Kate Moss implications:

1. Kate Moss was listed as a character witness for JD, but was barred from testifying, as past relationships are not deemed relevant to the case (restricted to just the parties; JD & AH).

2. Because AH mentioned her, and raised the specter of JD pushing KM down stairs, JD’s team can now call Kate Moss to the stand as a rebuttal witness.

3. Kate Moss is a JD supporter, and never reported any such incident…it’s a figment in AH’s mind.

4. Kate Moss will likely testify that JD was NEVER abusive, violent to her or pushed her down the stairs.

5. This may (albeit still to be determined) open up the line of questioning into AH’s past relationships - where she actually has an arrest record for DV - against her former wife/girlfriend, since she brought up one of JD’s past relationships.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5110795&forum_id=2#44524914)

i an wondering, though, if there's some chance the jury will despise them both for this entire indulgent shitshow.

my take: she's pure psycho and lied lied lied.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5110795&forum_id=2#44525379)

Washington Post computer servers allowed Depp lawyers to sue in commonwealth

Gustaf Kilander

The explosive defamation trial between Johnny Depp and Amber Heard is unfolding well outside their normal Hollywood orbit - at a court in Fairfax County, Virginia.

Mr Depp’s suit against his ex-wife alleges that she defamed him in a December 2018 op-ed published in The Washington Post titled “I spoke up against sexual violence — and faced our culture’s wrath. That has to change”.

The trial is taking place in Fairfax because the online edition of The Post is published via servers in the county, allowing Mr Depp to sue her in that area.

According to the Associated Press, Ms Heard’s attorneys tried to get the trial moved to California but Mr Depp’s lawyers said one of the reasons they decided to sue in Virginia was because of the state’s anti-SLAPP legislation, which is not as wide-ranging as in California.

SLAPP stands for strategic lawsuits against public participation. “Anti-SLAPP laws are meant to provide a remedy to SLAPP suits. Anti-SLAPP laws are intended to prevent people from using courts, and potential threats of a lawsuit, to intimidate people who are exercising their First Amendment rights,” according to the Reporters Committee.

In her 2018 op-ed, Ms Heard partly wrote that “like many women, I had been harassed and sexually assaulted by the time I was of college age. But I kept quiet — I did not expect filing complaints to bring justice. And I didn’t see myself as a victim”.

“Then two years ago, I became a public figure representing domestic abuse, and I felt the full force of our culture’s wrath for women who speak out,” she added at the time.

While Mr Depp isn’t named in the piece, his legal team argues that it contains a “clear implication that Mr Depp is a domestic abuser”, which they say is “categorically and demonstrably false”. Mr Depp is seeking damages of “not less than $50m”.

Ms Heard has filed a $100m counterclaim against Mr Depp for nuisance and immunity from his allegations.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5110795&forum_id=2#44525575)

Thank

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5110795&forum_id=2#44525482)

The lawyer who crossed her was literally laughing at her idiotic response that she "pledged" the money, but didn't give it yet because Johnny sued her. Except that he sued her 13 months AFTER she got the money and didn't donate it even though she was doing a press tour saying she donated it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5110795&forum_id=2#44525511)

if she wins here, i fully expect her to pay the $7 million minus her legal fees incurred for defending against this ridiculous suit.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5110795&forum_id=2#44525617)

Edit: never mind, apparently she donated her entire divorce settlement. That was dumb!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5110795&forum_id=2#44525786)