The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
making fun of charlene lat =first time I've hated xoxo
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 1st, 2007 4:48 PM Author: canary gunner And I have a pretty high bar, fuckers (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525500) |
 |
Date: February 1st, 2007 4:49 PM Author: Cerebral Plaza Yeah, that's pretty low. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525507) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 4:51 PM Author: Vigorous library blowjobs at auschwitz didnt do it for you, huh? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525515) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 4:57 PM Author: cheese-eating splenetic idea he suggested pisswyrm nor did porkchops and Africa, I guess. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525548) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 4:59 PM Author: slimy violent field quadroon Tragedy vs. statistic, and all that. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525556) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:02 PM Author: Mauve sticky shrine wagecucks i made one about anne frank too you faggot. it went something like "did anne frank give blowjobs in auschwitz for the pen and paper?" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525575) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:04 PM Author: lilac french step-uncle's house lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525582) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:08 PM Author: slimy violent field quadroon *pats sonic youth on head* (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525616) |
Date: February 1st, 2007 4:52 PM Author: lilac french step-uncle's house who is she? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525519) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 4:53 PM Author: hateful tattoo theatre i love it when noobs to the board act all shocked. OMG xoxo is racist/sexist/deadist! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525522) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 4:55 PM Author: lilac french step-uncle's house oh noes!! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525531) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 4:55 PM Author: hateful tattoo theatre oh noes insults all over xoxo why did i come to this place (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525534) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:00 PM Author: big puce newt Noobs indeed. I have no sympathy whatsoever for Lat. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525558) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:02 PM Author: floppy area generalized bond Well if you hadn't jumped off that building, he might still have had a respectable career as a federal prosecutor and nympho judiciary blogger. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525573) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:05 PM Author: hateful tattoo theatre *giggles* (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525591) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:40 PM Author: canary gunner Thanks Leiter, I've been posting since before the move from PR. Where the fuck were you this summer? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525869) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:54 PM Author: hateful tattoo theatre uh, enjoying life and my summer job? sorry i didnt have time to hang around here in order to feign outrage over stupid shit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525938) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:43 PM Author: canary gunner Fair enough, but nonetheless you seemed pretty confident in your knowlege of board posters to call me a noob or whatever. That only comes from major man-hours on the board. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526186) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 4:56 PM Author: Disrespectful Mewling Stage Yarmulke Who is Charlene Lat and where's the thread? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525539) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 4:58 PM Author: floppy area generalized bond http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=573260&mc=24&forum_id=2 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525550) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:08 PM Author: Disrespectful Mewling Stage Yarmulke That makes me sad. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525610) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:04 PM Author: disgusting regret business firm so sad (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525581) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:09 PM Author: onyx titillating tanning salon roommate yet somehow 'hey, cantor fitzgerald' never fazed you?? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525621) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:11 PM Author: big puce newt That very well might have been the absolute worst post in XOXO history.
|
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:12 PM Author: floppy area generalized bond I have to find my old post, I think Jiamie's birthday is coming up. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525654) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:12 PM Author: Deep Purple Associate (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525653) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:13 PM Author: ebony trailer park lettuce SO what happened to this sister? Where's the link? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525660) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:14 PM Author: Disrespectful Mewling Stage Yarmulke She was one of the NYU students who killed themselves in '03-'04. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525669) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:15 PM Author: onyx titillating tanning salon roommate jumped out of the window of his 25th floor apt while he was at work and the cleaning lady had 'stepped out for a minute'. i think the cleaning lady did it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525679) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:19 PM Author: ebony trailer park lettuce that wasn't the luis vutton chick with on the cover of the post was it?
fucking NYU undergrads are all retarded. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:23 PM Author: onyx titillating tanning salon roommate someone said the obit said she went to brown (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525755) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:29 PM Author: Cyan arousing resort Brown UG, I think she was at NYU for a masters. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525789) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:31 PM Author: onyx titillating tanning salon roommate ah. wtf were they doing to people over there? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525805) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:33 PM Author: Cyan arousing resort Must be suffocated by the TTTness. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525814) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:14 PM Author: Nighttime native I actually concur.
A touch gauche. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:18 PM Author: floppy area generalized bond Didn't we already have this whole discussion over James Kim? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525701) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:19 PM Author: hateful tattoo theatre and madame cunt's mom
and steve irwin
and elvios grbac
and barbaro
and on and on nad on. this feigned outrage is ridiculous |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:40 PM Author: Appetizing salmon house ape dont forget pat tillman. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525865) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:47 PM Author: razzle garrison jew but never with any of there relatives. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526641) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 9:00 PM Author: Bespoke set *their* (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7527168) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 8:01 PM Author: electric telephone someone was upset about Barbaro? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526738) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:19 PM Author: Crystalline skinny woman hall I don't think either side can claim the moral high ground here since people on both sites have engaged in pretty tasteless behavior.
Kinda funny really since I think under different circumstances we might have gotten along with Lat pretty well. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:21 PM Author: big puce newt You're probably right dude, but whatever. We closed down the comments on his blog and your job right now is to head over to the other thread and declare us the victor. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525731) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:29 PM Author: Crystalline skinny woman hall Comments seem to be back. Or at least the box is. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525790) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:30 PM Author: lilac french step-uncle's house the xoxo poster anon is a traitor
David, Can you please delete the vulgar comments above? Perhaps publish the poster's IP also. You don't want your board turning into xoxo.
Posted by: anon | February 1, 2007 05:28 PM
http://www.abovethelaw.com/2006/08/morning_docket_83006.php#comment-13070 |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:30 PM Author: Self-centered den I declare myself the vector. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525803) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:21 PM Author: Flesh Tripping Locus certainly we have enough guys posting as chicks on xoxo (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525738) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:24 PM Author: onyx titillating tanning salon roommate ?? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525761) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:26 PM Author: big puce newt When my big bro ran "underneath their robes" he posed as a woman big firm associate to disguise the fact that he's really a dood (albeit a little light in the loafers) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525770) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:28 PM Author: onyx titillating tanning salon roommate what a weirdo (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525785) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:48 PM Author: Flesh Tripping Locus I didn't realize this was a clue to "dan"s identity (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525911) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:50 PM Author: onyx titillating tanning salon roommate ?? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525920) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:52 PM Author: Flesh Tripping Locus methinks the lady doth protest too much: "what a weirdo" for a guy to pretend to be a girl on the internet. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525928) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:55 PM Author: onyx titillating tanning salon roommate hmm. you do recall it is the hypocrite who says that line in Hamlet, don't you? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525939) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:06 PM Author: Flesh Tripping Locus sure. you're not the guy pretending to be a woman, because guys who pretend to be women are weird, weird, weird. *wakes up* no I'm not a man posting as a woman or vice versa |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:27 PM Author: Deranged parlour Do you think he wore her clothes when he was blogging at Underneath Their Robes? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525777) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:36 PM Author: Unholy galvanic hunting ground pretty low. difference between james kim, steve erwin, etc. is that xoers weren't making those comments on their family member's blogs. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:38 PM Author: canary gunner jinx! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525846) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:38 PM Author: hateful tattoo theatre uh, madame cunt? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525854) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:42 PM Author: canary gunner Madame Cunt is as close as this board has ever come to a genuinely deranged invidivudal. And as I recall, the board had a near-unanimous moment of consenus in condemning J for dredging up the details of her mother's death. Lat, by contrast, seems a very odd and potentially mentally ill individual, but he does not seem like a fundementally bad person who might deserve having his very real personal tragedies being flung back in his face by a confederacy of dung-wielding internet dunces. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525883) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:48 PM Author: hateful tattoo theatre "posting comments on his own page is what distinguishes it in my mind."
your own words. MC was actually posting here when it was done, and plenty of people continuned mocked her after it. your attempt to minimalize it by calling her 'genuinely deranged' is idiotic - she was a member of the board, posting here, while her mom's death was rubbed into her face. rage all you want, no skin off my back, but selective outrage is ridiculous and hypocritical beyond words. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:02 PM Author: canary gunner Easy to stray into hyperbole, isn't it? I appreciate your lawyerly instinct to dredge up some ostensibly contradictory behavior and label me "hypocritical beyond words, but the fact of the matter is that I hardly laughed at Madame Cunt's predicament or found it appropriate. I found it odious, but it did not inspire the same kind of visceral revulsion as the Lat affair, in large part because Madame Cunt voluntarily returned to the board again and again, flamed it, assumed alternate monikers, and generally inserted herself into a highly volatile discusison in the venue where the insulting comments were eventually posted by J. Lat, on the other hand, has taken a few swips at xo from his website but certainly has not really interfered too much in the board's affairs and has not posted here, and yet we feel content to make revoltinng comments on his website *for other, third party web-surfers to read*. If you can't tell the difference between the two scenarious, I wonder what kind of lawyer you'll be. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525966) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:22 PM Author: hateful tattoo theatre oh goody, here come the ad hominems. first of all, you sound like a high school sophomore in love wiht his own voice. learn to write, not spew. (see, i can do it too)
second, the 'hyperbole' began when you started this thread. oh noes, due to an incident that has nothing to do with you, you now HATE xoxo! the horror! is the sand in your pussy itchy, too? how will we be able to sleep tonight, subject to your festering hatred? perhaps i'll just lie awake in bed, staring at the ceiling, worrying about the fact that someone on xoxo 'hates' me and xoxo. or not.
now that the insults are done with, to address your actual points
1. Madame cunt was a psoter here. if you really can't figure out the why i called you out on your moral outrage that xoxo is insulting lat on his own page, considering she actually posted here and read through all the comments about her dead mother, i'm not going to waste time explaining. however, your desperate backtracking in now claiming that the real reason you didnt complain about the MC incident is because she 'inserted' herself into it and thus somehow deserved it is evidence that you do know why. good for you.
2. this is xoxo. offensive shit gets posted here. get over it or go kill yourself, two classic options. i don't approve of it, i don't partake in it, but most importantly, i dont post verbal diarrhea chastising a message board which i KNOW consists of jokes about holocaust victims, james kim, pat tillman, dead soldiers in iraq, anne frank, blacks, jews, asians, women, men, and pretty much every segment of the popuation, for being offensive |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:35 PM Author: canary gunner I don't really want to go in circles re ad hominems so I'll leave it alone.
All the same, still haven't addressed my point that Madame Cunt could have left at any point. She didn't have to read through the comments about her dead mother. She had virtually no investment in xo, at least not like Lat has investment in his proprietary blog dedicated primarily to legal gossip, not xoxo-style invective. He can't simply ignore our postings and it's certainly not fair to expect him to shut down the site.
Your second paragraph I think reveals the problem here, since it demonstrates you haven't even grasped the point I've been making all along, let alone responded to it: this is different than offensive but self-contained race baiting, etc, which people voluntarily buy into when they read xo. It extends beyond the site into a place where it's not so easy to disengage or ignore. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:51 PM Author: hateful tattoo theatre do you even read this board? you do realize that NYPDrant was flooded with insults about dead cops and "faggot firefighters," and various message boards, blogs, websites, are constantly invaded, torn apart with vicious and offensive comments, and then discarded when the shine is off the new toy? if you really wanted to take a stand, it should have been a year and a half ago when an obituary of a poster's family was posted and mocked. but no, there it was ok because you consider the person 'deranged', and let's face it, you didn't like her anyway. so that was ok. now though, it's not ok, cause you don't dislike lat. now, shame on xoxo. you hate xoxo.
go throw your moral outrage party somewhere else, i hear LSD is hiring. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:03 PM Author: canary gunner It's not really fair for you to reduce my argument about Madame Cunt to "I didn't really like her" since I've already explained why I view the situation with Lat as distinct from hers.
Anyway, NYPDrant was a message board where ornery cops come to complain. It's combative by nature. It does not provide news or gossip to a wide range of professionals (edit: professionals who have no interest in flaming or personal vendettas) and it's not propriety to one person, unlike like Lat's site. It's silly to compare a flame war between two inherently vindictive message boards (certainly the references to "faggot firefighters" and "dead cops" were generic insults, not specific to a particular loss suffered by a particular poster) to a posting on Lat's own website, which he maintains and must read, about a fresh and no doubt very painful tragedy in his life.
Put more simply, a cop knows what he's getting into when he posts on NYPD rant, and he can close the window anytime. Lat didn't neccessarily invite this kind of below-the-belt commentary when he passed a few snarky comments xoxo's way. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:08 PM Author: hateful tattoo theatre in other words, it's only offensive when you think it is. in every other case, it's not offensive enough. good for you for being there to tell everyone where the lines are, you pristine judge of xo morality
i offer you the classic solution - GOI. seriously. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:17 PM Author: canary gunner Of course it's offensive when I think it is. As I explained below, that's the case for most everybody, unless you have some special rubric you obtained from a third party that informs you of what ought to offend you.
And I've distinguished this case from other cases on certain grounds, which I won't both repeating here. If you don't find them compelling, fine, but it's silly to say I'm being sanctimonious because I find something offensive and you don't. On those grounds, every difference of opinion on questions of morality or ethics would involve one party acting as a "pristine judge." |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:08 PM Author: Crystalline skinny woman hall I don't think Lat's site is proprietary to him... it's owned by Dealbreaker and I think he just gets paid a salary to run it (a la Jeff Adams on old PR).
(note: Not saying I disagree with your post. Just clarifying that one point). |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:13 PM Author: canary gunner Sure, but it's very strongly associated with him in a way xoxo is not with one person. And he is very invested in it professionally, personally etc. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526432) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:17 PM Author: Crystalline skinny woman hall Don't you think he should be responsible for his own actions though? No one's forcing him to be a public figure like this.
Also, what about the fact that he voluntarily drew attention to the news story about his sister, linking to it in order to avoid (potentially justifiable) attacks that he was making light of the mentally ill and being racist? |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:21 PM Author: canary gunner I don't think there's a public figure alive, all the way up to world leaders and celebrities, who deserve to be taunted about the death of a loved one. Frankly, I even found it a bit crass when we gloated over the death of Uday and Qusay. Not that I wasn't happy to see those monsters go, but I think we ought to be above using personal loss to belittle others.
Edit: As concerns him linking to the site, that was in poor taste but I don't think it justifies using his dead sister as bait in a flame war. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 8:06 PM Author: Red anal church building "3. Please do not write to us to point out that the Penn law student in question is probably mentally ill, that mental illness is no laughing matter etc. We know. If you want to have a pissing contest with us over sensitivity to mental illness, bring it," where the words "bring it" are linked to his sister's obit.
Not exactly on the same level as xoxo posts; at the same time, not exactly evincing a high level of respect or sensitivity for his own sister's death. And it seems to almost gleefully invite a response. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 8:34 PM Author: irate concupiscible deer antler address lat posted that on UTR? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526954) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 8:37 PM Author: Red anal church building Yes. That was how the whole l'affair du Charlene Lat started in the first place -- he used it to justify his entry about the Penn guy, which is where all the CL comments began.
|
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:52 PM Author: Unholy galvanic hunting ground well, that was shitty too, but lat's not a poster and isn't engaged in batshit wars with xo. yes, maybe he's scuffed xo's puma, but this shit with his sister is just ridiculous. lat: please credit above the law xo: your sister sucks dick like mashed potatoes! |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:59 PM Author: hateful tattoo theatre i'll agree with you it was "shitty too". saying that it's ok since he's not a psoter is silly, if anything, it's worse to do something like that to an actual member of your own community. lastly, lat's done some stupid shit too - read up on the airplane scandal threads
i'm not defending what xo is doing, i think it's ridiculous and i'm not taking part in it, but getting outraged over it is even stupider. it's xoxo, shit like this has happened as long as most people can remember.
and 'declaring' your outrage by starting a thread on the very forum you purport to abhor (not you, the OP) is about as stupid as it gets |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:16 PM Author: canary gunner Why is it stupid to post on a forum I largely enjoy, but at the moment find quite despicable? I certainly didnt' say I "abhored" xo, rather that it was the "first time" I've "hated" it. You're assuming I have a static irreversible view of this site and now that I find it behaving particularly poorly should quit it entirely. In fact, it's not entirely unreasonable that by starting this thread people will be slightly more circumspect in pulling the Lat shit. Maybe it will have the opposite effect. Who knows. But claiming that starting a discussion or expressing a strong sentiment that might possibly register with others is "as stupid as it gets" reeks of ad-hominem desparation.
And as for our treatment of MC being worse because it was in our own community, see above: to put it briefly, MC could have left at any time and the only people following the drama were the interested parties. We've brought this ugliness to Lat's site, where a larger community of readers will view it and where Lat cannot avoid it. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:17 PM Author: onyx titillating tanning salon roommate too long. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526053) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:20 PM Author: canary gunner I can understand why you may find it daunting seeing how it is longer than the RU-486 dosage instructions. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526068) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:22 PM Author: Cyan arousing resort rrreowwwrrr. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526079) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:20 PM Author: Unholy galvanic hunting ground i think my problem with it is not only that it's in poor taste, it's being taken beyond the boundaries of xo. i wouldn't be complaining if someone started a thread about it here, but i think posting vulgar insults about his dead sister on his blog and then trotting back here for praise is crossing a line. i do agree that this thread is largely useless, because some posters can't distinguish between harmless banter on xo and flinging shit in public. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:37 PM Author: canary gunner woah, delicious, my OP left unattended thus germinated a substantial thread.
Anyway, I don't care what the fuck you say on this site but posting comments on his own page is what distinguishes it in my mind. It's one thing to make fun of James Kim; it'd be another to compile our nasty postings and then express mail it to his widow. I hope this resolves the statistic v. tragedy debate as well, which was a touch too obvious to bring up, wasn't it? |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:47 PM Author: Self-centered den WTF are you talking about? Charlene Lat sure as hell isn't victimized by comments on here or her brother's website. After all, she's pancake. The only person who could possibly be affected substantially by this is David Lat. And he deserves it, well, because he's been such a douchebag wrt xo.
James Kim, Christopher Reeve don't deserve IRL mailings and such, because they've brought hours of merriment to our board. Not the same thing with Lat. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:53 PM Author: canary gunner Dear latest autogenerated whokebe permutation:
Thanks for so elegantly debunking my claim that Charlene Lat was victimized, a position that I advanced qutie vigorously in this thread. And as for David Lat, I'm not entirely persuaded that we can justify what is certainly a kind of emotional torture, or at least an attempt at it, on the so-called douchebag doctrine.
Best Regards
Hogtorts |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:00 PM Author: Self-centered den >And as for David Lat, I'm not entirely persuaded that we can justify what is certainly a kind of emotional torture, or at least an attempt at it, on the so-called douchebag doctrine.
Translation: "In other words, this is moral turpitude because it offends my good sense."
Sincerely,
Whokebe in exile |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:09 PM Author: canary gunner Of course I feel it's moral turpitude because it offends my good sense you moron. Isn't that how anyone, save a mindless drone who reaches for some holy book of dicta or off-the-shelf ideology, determines what is offensive. Do you have another fucking suggestion? I've explained what distinguishes it in my mind from other xoxo-related antics, I've identified the behavior that I find particularly repugant and I've given it a name. If you don't find it offensive, so be it, but do you really think it's a devastating retort to say I find it morally repugnant because it offends me? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526000) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:21 PM Author: Self-centered den I find your self-righteousness more morally repugnant than any tasteless comment made here or on Lat's blog. Therefore, you're an enchilada of moral turpitude. Holy shit, I can make circular reasoning, too! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526071) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:25 PM Author: canary gunner I suppose you find it morally repugnant because it offends your sense of good taste?
Anyway, it must be nice to live in a moral universe where one of the cardinal sins is being offended by mockery of a dead relative. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:33 PM Author: Self-centered den That's funny. Not ha-ha funny in the way you find that Friends punchline as refreshingly droll the fifth time you watch it as the first, but still kinda funny, you know, like the color your panties turn as your vagina drools uselessly and seeps its monthly weepings through your makeshift Barbaro-fur crotchcloth. But wait, maybe funny isn't the right word for it. Better term to describe your utter inability to distinguish your opinion from your heavy-handed, schoolmarmish self-righteous screeds: tragicomedy. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526122) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:37 PM Author: canary gunner It wasn't meant to be a joke. No doubt it's far easier to accuse me of sanctimony than to respond to any of my claims. I guess we can leave it at that. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526145) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:42 PM Author: Self-centered den You're delusional. You've offered no coherent moral framework for your rants other than circular reasoning. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526181) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:46 PM Author: canary gunner What coherent moral framework would you suggest as an alternative? Is it really so hard to grasp why a person might find it repugnant? I mean, I think we all know most of what's posted on xo is offensive. I said it's especially vile because it takes that offensiveness and lobs it at Lat's site. I don't think a person should have to choose between terminating a publication into which he has poured a great deal of effort and enduring crass comments about his dead sister. Perhaps you'd like me to bolster this principle with arguments from Plato and Kant, but I think it stands on its own just fine.
Edit: Oh and nice edit with the enchilada bit. I find editing morally repugnant. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:55 PM Author: Self-centered den Are you an idiot, or are you a motherfucking idiot? Lat suffers no irreversible damage from any of this.
a) He has chosen to make a living out of making often mean-spirited and snarky blog entries on his site. He leaves himself open to the same. The difference between his comments and xo's is a matter of degrees, not fundamental difference.
b) Many, many blogs have a moderated comment section. Terminating a publication, my ass.
|
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:59 PM Author: hateful tattoo theatre you're really grasping for straws when your outrage shifts from the fact that this was done to lat having to 'terminate his publication'. this has never happened and will never happen, and if you've been here as long as you claim you have, you know that. xo doesnt have teh attention span to keep it up.
in fact, your continued posts about how terrible it is are just fuelling the flames. if you hadn't started this thread and made your lofty proclamations of xo reaching a new low and how offensive and how much you hate the board, it would have died out hours ago. i'll grant you your excitement at finally having people pay attention to a thread you started, though. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:06 PM Author: Self-centered den I generally like hogtort's posts, but she/he really crossed the line with this thread. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526377) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:13 PM Author: hateful tattoo theatre i dont even know who hogtorts is, i merely dislike the (extremely undeserved) condescending moral superiority brimming over each of his psots. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526425) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:38 PM Author: canary gunner As I've said quite a few times at this point, you have somehow concluded that I am lording my superior moral character over you all when all I've done is remark that something upset me quite a lot. I called whoever did it "fuckers," which does not seem unreasonably given my view of their actions, and I later called it moral turpitude. That's not the same as holding myself up as a paragon for others to follow or claiming that I am more virtuous than other xo posters. I wouldn't leave comments like that on Lat's site, so perhaps in that discreet sense I am morally superior to those who did so, but to turn this into an argument about my "condescending moral superiority" seems off-point. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526585) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:14 PM Author: Crystalline skinny woman hall Crossed the line? How so? He's just giving his opinion. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526433) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:19 PM Author: Self-centered den It was a post meant to be as ridiculous as his line of reasoning. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526471) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:28 PM Author: canary gunner I'm still waiting for you to enlighten me on the appropriate means of expressing moral disdain, Tor. At the moment you've done little more than accuse me of reasoning circularly because I, quite openly, made a subjective personal judgment, just as any person does when they express an opinion on moral issues unless they are a religious literalist. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526514) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:33 PM Author: Self-centered den Our abrasive exchanges aside, I'm curious to see your response to my post above. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526551) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:12 PM Author: canary gunner You accused me of moral grandstanding without cause, I explained in further detail why this particular action was offensive by illustrating its potential effects, and now you accuse me of shifting arguments? I mean, all I've done is provide an illustration of why invading someone's personal webspace uninvited is different than insulting someone on xoxo, a distinction you don't seem to appreciate.
Not to return to the ad-hominem bromides, but take a look at your post and tell me if you are addressing me purely on substance. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:46 PM Author: Outnumbered azure cuckold Your reply was funny, but hogtorts devastated you. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526206) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:50 PM Author: Self-centered den There's a police scanner on sale at Sears. You should hurry.
HTH |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:50 PM Author: canary gunner Running on fumes, eh? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526247) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:52 PM Author: Outnumbered azure cuckold What a weak reply. It's telling then when someone points out your intellectual bankruptcy in this thread, this is the best you can come up with. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526264) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:59 PM Author: Self-centered den I will put more effort into replying to your posts when you:
a) Say something funny, or b) Offer substantive commentary of your own, instead of being a worthless fucking parasite on threads. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:59 PM Author: Outnumbered azure cuckold Funny, I could have made the exact same post to you. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526326) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:02 PM Author: Self-centered den a) >Your reply was funny. your words. b) Not my fault that you're too stupid to parse out insults from pointing out flaws in hogtort's arguments.
HTFH |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:07 PM Author: Outnumbered azure cuckold The idea that you pointed out 'flaws' in his argument is laughable when you did nothing more than post 'OMG CIRCULAR REASONING!" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526382) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:10 PM Author: Self-centered den http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526295
HTFHYSMF |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:15 PM Author: Outnumbered azure cuckold Oh, you decided 30 minutes later to post something marginally relevant and completely without substance?
Yeah, good job. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:18 PM Author: Self-centered den Again, I invite you to post something either: a)funny, or b) substantive.
in lieu of your current parasitism. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:24 PM Author: Outnumbered azure cuckold I'm not sure what you mean by 'substantive', since it's a pretty fucking simple point.
Going to someone's website and posting jokes about their dead sister offends (normal) sensibilities. Is this really that hard to understand? Your defense of the situation, namely, 'David Lat does the same thing all the time so it's ok for xoxo to do it!' is not only weak, it's absolutely pathetic.
EDIT: And yes, I will enjoy the stock response: This is xoxo, we expect it on here, etc etc |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:30 PM Author: Self-centered den Because you say it is while failing to say why? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526525) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:33 PM Author: Outnumbered azure cuckold Oh, I'm sorry, did you want me to spout off something about the categorical imperative? Is this going to devolve into a debate over morals? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526547) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:36 PM Author: Red anal church building The retarded thing is it's not even a debate about morals. It's a debate over whether or not somebody's individual idiosyncratic reaction to something was in fact somebody's individual idiosyncratic reaction to something. The entire point seems ridiculous; expecting somebody to have some kind of objective and completely consistent standard for their emotional reactions is pointless. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526570) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:39 PM Author: Outnumbered azure cuckold You're right, 'morals' was the wrong choice to use. Social mores seems more on point (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526591) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:37 PM Author: Self-centered den As much as I think hogtorts is wrong on this particular issue, I don't particularly mind the exchange with him, warty invectives and all.
You, OTOH, are worthless. Have your last word. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:43 PM Author: Outnumbered azure cuckold Ok, I'll admit it, this was pretty good flame. Had me going for a while. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526612) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:52 PM Author: Self-centered den No, no, no. I really do think you're worthless. Honest to God and Joseph Smith. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526678) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 8:02 PM Author: Outnumbered azure cuckold I don't have a particularly high opinion of you either. So it seems we're even. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526740) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:53 PM Author: hateful tattoo theatre you're welcome to post how offended you are. everyone else is also welcome to tell you how stupid your stance is, which they are doing here. cest xoxo. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526271) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:46 PM Author: canary gunner It's hardly a wash in your favor. Seems people are split and no one is arguing your side very voficerously beyond you and tor. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526632) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:52 PM Author: hateful tattoo theatre and no one at all is arguing your side "vociferously" besides you.
it's a stupid debate, and i will turn again to the xo catchall - GOI. i'm sorry you hate xo. go throw a pity party on lsd and jdjive, you'd have company there |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:44 PM Author: Appetizing salmon house ape thank fucking god people on this board dont get so outraged everytime someone innocent is killed. not kills themself by choice but is KILLED. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525893) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 5:48 PM Author: canary gunner Frankly, I feel that the fact that a number of the posters can't seem to distinguish between this and other unpleasantness on the board is further proof of its descent from a society of well-educated (mostly male) young individuals giggling over outrageous but ultimately self-contained taboo-busting to an arena of genuine moral turpitude (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525906) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:00 PM Author: onyx titillating tanning salon roommate Hi Lat (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525957) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:04 PM Author: Cyan arousing resort Can't believe it took this long. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7525975) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:11 PM Author: onyx titillating tanning salon roommate sorry. i'm a little off my game today. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526005) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:18 PM Author: canary gunner Not an association I care to cultivate, I'll admit. Do a search for my moniker. If I'm him, I've been running a pretty random, unrelated incognito shtick for some time now. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526057) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:19 PM Author: onyx titillating tanning salon roommate subtle genius (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526062) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:23 PM Author: charismatic really tough guy subtle, but i wouldn't go that far (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526084) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:12 PM Author: excitant rigor macaca Hey, go fuck yourself. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526015) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 6:53 PM Author: ebony trailer park lettuce I dont see why we have this outrage for mocking suicides.
Unlike Barbaro, Pat Tillman and Elvis Grbac, this chick who killed herself is in the real-life Hell, not the fun flag football hell. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:29 PM Author: soggy balding nursing home link (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526519) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:33 PM Author: fuchsia bisexual idiot I'm not one for censorship, but the people who posted that shit were really pathetic. The guy lost his sister, for christ's sake. You don't have to rub his face in it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526546) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 9:19 PM Author: domesticated french chef scourge upon the earth Agreed.
Stuff like this is why I retired a few weeks ago. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:41 PM Author: canary gunner Ah well, I need to run. I think I've made my points here clearly enough. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526601) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 7:50 PM Author: Self-centered den http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526551
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526295 |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 8:04 PM Author: canary gunner PNNC
Just kidding. I'll try to respond to them later but I really have to run. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 8:02 PM Author: soggy balding nursing home
3:57, that was in incredibly poor taste and I hope your comment is removed.
Also, I think it was shaped more like an omelette.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 1, 2007 04:03 PM
|
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 8:03 PM Author: electric telephone could someone please summarize the situation? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526752) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 8:05 PM Author: canary gunner Why don't you just read some of it you dumb cunt? Do you expect everything to be spoon-fed through your curry-slathered lips?
Edit: That one was for old times, xoxo |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 8:07 PM Author: electric telephone There's somehting mentioned on other sites. I don't know what those sites are and the chronology of events. also, apparently someone is an xoxo poster and i don't know who.
why are you so fucking lazy? |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 8:19 PM Author: floppy area generalized bond Just read http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=573260&mc=24&forum_id=2 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526857) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 8:30 PM Author: electric telephone thanks. but who's Joseph Cho and who are these people on xoxo? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526924) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 8:32 PM Author: floppy area generalized bond GI Cho (thanks Vector!) is the real American hero defending us from Indian spies. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526942) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 8:34 PM Author: electric telephone I thought his name was Lat?
And who is he on xoxo? He's a poster here? |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 8:45 PM Author: floppy area generalized bond David Lat is the blogger who used to write Underneath Their Robes and now writes Above the Law. I think he might have had a couple posts on Xo before but he's definitely not a regular here. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7527037) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 8:55 PM Author: electric telephone is cho a poster? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7527128) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 8:59 PM Author: floppy area generalized bond No, but apparently some Xoxo'ers know him IRL, and there was some suspicion that he was a poster because he's at a T14 and was itching to kill a minority. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7527162) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 9:00 PM Author: electric telephone oh. I thought I read somewhere that he's the author of the thread that xoxo is a shitty source of info.
Okay, all's clear now. Thanks. Sorry. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 8:06 PM Author: soggy balding nursing home
David, we need to chat. You see, while my restless heathen soul wanders the earth in despair, I occasionally stop in to check up on old family and friends. And honestly, what you do on your own time is your business, but I'd appreciate it if you'd just throw out my old panties and go buy your own. Surely you still have some of that BIGLAW cheddar lying around.
Posted by: Charlene Lat's Pancake Shaped Ghost | February 1, 2007 05:34 PM
|
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 8:08 PM Author: soggy balding nursing home f a girl falls 25 stories to the pavement, but no one is around to hear it, does she make a spLAT?
Posted by: Anonymous | February 1, 2007 05:59 PM |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 8:26 PM Author: Exciting Yellow Site It's certainly not the first time I think posters here have gone overboard, but it definitely is one of the worst cases. The only other comparable situation is probably the Madame Cunt incident. Of course, unlike MC, Lat has done very little (excusing his general douchebaggery) to provoke such personal insults. There's not even any wit or cleverness to it. It's pure trash. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526898) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 8:39 PM Author: electric telephone wtf? No has sympathy for my boobs being posted repeatedly hundreds of times against my will?
Who the fuck cares about Steve Irwin? |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 8:41 PM Author: Exciting Yellow Site You posted the fucking picture! And you've also never been outted, so for all we know those boobs are not your boobs. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7526995) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 8:44 PM Author: electric telephone wtf no i didn't. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7527029) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 8:47 PM Author: floppy area generalized bond Lat brought up his sister himself -- to defend himself against criticism that he was making fun of the mentally ill, no less. Pretty lame move on his part, IMO. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7527045) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 8:48 PM Author: Exciting Yellow Site Sure, but that hardly justifies such a response.
Besides, his entire blog is lame. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 8:52 PM Author: Red anal church building Even if he linked to her obituary with the words "bring it on?" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7527093) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 8:54 PM Author: Exciting Yellow Site He was talking aout a debate over mental illness sensitivity, not gratuitous personal insults about his dead sister.
And that's the last word I'll say in defense of this jackass. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 9:01 PM Author: floppy area generalized bond I thought that was really stupid -- he's saying, hey, I'm Asian, so I can make fun of GI Cho and Apu at the convenience store, oh and my sister was crazy and suicidal, so I can make fun of crazy people too. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7527175) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 9:06 PM Author: Red anal church building And if you want to give me shit for making fun of crazy people, BRING IT ON!!! BTW HERE IS MY CRAAAZZZY SISTER'S OBITUARY! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7527224) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 8:48 PM Author: electric telephone LINK?
I don't get this whole thing! |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 8:54 PM Author: floppy area generalized bond Link to Lat's article is in the thread I posted. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7527108) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 8:57 PM Author: Outnumbered azure cuckold I was not aware of this. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7527136) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 8:59 PM Author: hateful tattoo theatre posted above
"3. Please do not write to us to point out that the Penn law student in question is probably mentally ill, that mental illness is no laughing matter etc. We know. If you want to have a pissing contest with us over sensitivity to mental illness, bring it," where the words "bring it" are linked to his sister's obit.
i didnt even know he did this and still think what happened was immature and childish, but what a douche |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 8:53 PM Author: Beady-eyed Chartreuse Box Office Faggotry i only feel sorry for those who saw those fatty yambags. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7527102) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 9:11 PM Author: Glassy Stubborn Gaming Laptop Goal In Life I've long since stopped feeling outrage at anything on this site, but this wasn't really all that funny. Pretty tasteless, ultimately boring, like Jim Carey. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7527255) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 9:19 PM Author: cordovan filthy corner "Message from XOXO:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sogKUx_q7ig
HTH
Posted by: Anonymous | February 1, 2007 08:50 PM
" |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 9:21 PM Author: domesticated french chef scourge upon the earth You are a fucking loser. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7527319) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 11:07 PM Author: lilac french step-uncle's house someone on lats board found where i worked and posted it in a thread. its been taken down but needless to say i am FUCKING PISSED!!! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7528171) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 11:11 PM Author: onyx titillating tanning salon roommate ? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7528200) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 11:11 PM Author: hateful tattoo theatre haha. that'd be fucking hilarious, and tbh you'd deserve it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7528203) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 11:14 PM Author: lilac french step-uncle's house no i did not. either way i have leverage against the person now. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7528227) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 11:13 PM Author: Self-centered den How did they find out? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7528213) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 11:14 PM Author: Orchid motley point electric furnace LAT A TAT TAT (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7528229) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 11:16 PM Author: lilac french step-uncle's house ???
either way they or the mods took it down promptly so its appreciated but a sheisty thing still |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 11:28 PM Author: Orchid motley point electric furnace how do you think it could've happened if not via lat or another blog person? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7528339) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2007 11:32 PM Author: lilac french step-uncle's house yeah i think lat did it but had second thoughts. i sent GTO an email. i dont know what good it will do but i was really freaked out.
|
|
Date: March 7th, 2007 6:52 PM Author: canary gunner When the grand history of xoxo is written, I will be heralded as a prophet of the coming calamity. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573296&forum_id=2#7722990) |